{"created":"2023-06-19T09:35:42.348529+00:00","id":102,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"91c5a40e-b216-4a61-9e1b-246d5b085754"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"102","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"102"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:mue.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000102","sets":["1:3:7"]},"author_link":["1181"],"item_1_alternative_title_5":{"attribute_name":"論文名よみ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"コクミン ノ シホウ サンカ ニツイテ ノ イチコウサツ : サイバンイン セイド ノ ゴウケンセイ ニ カンシテ"}]},"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2008","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"25","bibliographicPageStart":"11","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"43","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"宮城教育大学紀要"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"鈴木, 法日児"},{"creatorName":"スズキ, ノリヒコ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1181","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"},{"nameIdentifier":"9000002479106","nameIdentifierScheme":"CiNii ID","nameIdentifierURI":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/nrid/9000002479106"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The aim of this paper is to consider the constitutionality of the lay assessor (saiban-in) system which will start in May 2009. The system is said to be not the jury system, because lay assessors and judges make judgment together about the fact finding, the application of law and the assessment of a case. This system is said to be similar to \"das Schöffengericht\" in Germany. According to the Constitution of Japan, the whole judicial power is vested in a Supreme Court and the inferior courts which consist of the judges (§76, §79, §80). But there is an idea that the inferior courts can consist of the judges and the lay assessors. This idea is unconstitutional because the lay assessors shall have parts of the judicial power. Although they are permitted to do the fact finding, they are not permitted to do the application of law and the assessment of a case, which are parts of the judicial power. It is concluded that the lay assessor system is contrary to the Constitution of Japan (§76 I , §32, §37 I ).","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA1125110X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1_text_2":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"論文"}]},"item_1_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"宮城教育大学教育学部社会科教育講座"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2008-01-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00005236299.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.2 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KJ00005236299","url":"https://mue.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/102/files/KJ00005236299.pdf"},"version_id":"9a464422-41d3-42de-85d0-ad7d8b94d7b6"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"裁判所・法廷","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"司法権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"事実認定","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"法令の適用","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"刑の量定","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"court","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Judicial power","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the fact finding","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the application of law","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the assessment of a case","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"国民の「司法参加」についての一考察 : 裁判員制度の合憲性に関して","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"国民の「司法参加」についての一考察 : 裁判員制度の合憲性に関して"},{"subitem_title":"The relationship of the people and the courts in the Constitution of Japan","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"3","path":["7"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2008-01-01"},"publish_date":"2008-01-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"102","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["国民の「司法参加」についての一考察 : 裁判員制度の合憲性に関して"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-06-19T10:09:49.814264+00:00"}