{"created":"2025-04-16T02:02:59.262985+00:00","id":2000219,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"14f5b5d0-eef4-48a1-bad7-f35e33736111"},"_deposit":{"created_by":16,"id":"2000219","owners":[16],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000219"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:mue.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000219","sets":["1:3:1744615300544"]},"author_link":[],"control_number":"2000219","item_1_alternative_title_5":{"attribute_name":"論文名よみ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"活動している理想的発話状況 －討議／論争デモクラシーを超える子どもの哲学（p4c）ハワイとみやぎ－","subitem_alternative_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2025-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"215","bibliographicPageStart":"205","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"59","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"宮城教育大学紀要","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"TABATA,Taketo","creatorNameLang":"en"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"WERNER,Griffin","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿の目的は、子どもの哲学ハワイ・みやぎスタイル(p4cHI-M)を、討議デモクラシーと論争デモクラシーの文脈に位置づけ、p4cHI-Mの理論と実践を深く掘り下げ、記述することである。まず、p4cHI-Mと討議デモクラシーの緊張関係を検討した。ハーバーマスに由来する討議デモクラシーの2つのコア概念を、「合意形成」と「理想的発話状況」として抽出し、p4cHI-Mとの相違点と共通点を検討した。理想的発話状況はp4cHI-Mと共鳴する。理想的発話状況が非現実的であるという誤解を解くために、この概念形成に影響を与えたと推測されるハイデガーを参照した。テクスト解釈により、それは存在論的で生きられた経験であることが明らかになった。合意形成という点では、p4cHI-Mは討議デモクラシーと対立する。この点で、p4cHI-Mはコノリーの「論争デモクラシー」と共鳴する。両者の重なりを述べた後、論争デモクラシーのアゴニスティック・リスペクトとp4cHI-Mのセーフティとの違いを検討した。アゴニスティック・リスペクトは市民的美徳として涵養されるものであるのに対し、p4cHI-Mのセーフティは言語能力のある者ならだれでも有する資質・能力であり、涵養の必要がないことが判明した。p4cHI-Mのセーフティは、討議／論争デモクラシー、その他の民主主義の諸形態を可能にする存在論的前提である。それはあらゆる可能性に開かれている。本稿の帰結は、この存在論的次元は禅の観点から記述し理解できるという仮説である。試みとして、私たちは西谷啓治の空の立場から、私たちが「活動している理想的発話状況」と呼ぶ、p4cHI-Mのセーフな対話状況を存在論的に記述した。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The aim of this paper is to place philosophy for/with children (p4c), Hawaii-Miyagi style, in the context of deliberative and agonistic democracy to describe its theory and practice in greater depth. First, we examine the tension between p4c and deliberative democracy. We extract two core concepts out of Jürgen Habermas’s deliberative democracy, namely, consensus building and ideal speech situations, and examine the differences and similarities between them and p4c. The ideal speech situation is resonant with p4c. In order to dispel the misconception that the ideal speech situation is unrealistic, Heidegger, who influenced this concept’s formation, is referenced. Through textual interpretation we reveal that the ideal speech situation is ontological yet rooted in lived experience. In terms of consensus building, p4c is at odds with deliberative democracy. On that point, p4c resonates with William Connolly’s agonistic democracy. We examine the differences between agonistic respect and the safety of p4c by considering agonistic respect as a cultivated civic virtue compared to safety which provides the ontological ground for such cultivation. The safety of p4c is an ontological prerequisite that makes deliberative democracy, agonistic democracy, and other forms of democracy possible. It is open to all possibilities. The conclusion of this paper is that this ontological dimension can be described and understood from the perspective of Zen. Drawing from Nishitani Keiji’s conception of the standpoint of emptiness, we describe the safe situation in p4c, which we call the ideal speech situation in action.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA1125110X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available"}],"filename":"Bulletin-MUE-D-24-00037田端健人先生.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"256.2 KB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"An Ideal Speech Situation in Action: p4cHawaiʻi and Miyagi beyond Deliberative and Agonistic Democracy","url":"https://mue.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000219/files/Bulletin-MUE-D-24-00037田端健人先生.pdf"},"version_id":"3f7fdb22-e037-4387-b460-22cccacb2b65"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"consensus","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ontologicaldifference","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"livedexperience","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"identity and difference","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"śūnyatā (emptiness, 空 Kū)","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"合意形成","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"存在論的差異","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"生きられた経験","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"アイデンティティと差異","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"空 (Kū)","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"An Ideal Speech Situation in Action: p4cHawaiʻi and Miyagi beyond Deliberative and Agonistic Democracy","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"An Ideal Speech Situation in Action: p4cHawaiʻi and Miyagi beyond Deliberative and Agonistic Democracy","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"16","path":["1744615300544"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2025-04-16"},"publish_date":"2025-04-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000219","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["An Ideal Speech Situation in Action: p4cHawaiʻi and Miyagi beyond Deliberative and Agonistic Democracy"],"weko_creator_id":"16","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2025-04-17T05:59:37.190194+00:00"}