WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
Computer vs. Paper: Which works best for language learning?
https://mue.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/499
https://mue.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/499e02b52b2-a311-47c9-836d-ea5a7002b532
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Computer vs. Paper: Which works best for language learning? (9.0 MB)
|
.png)
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-02-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Computer vs. Paper: Which works best for language learning? | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | コンピューター支援語学学習 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 教育工学 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 日本における英語教育 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 大学生 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Educational technology | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | EFL in Japan | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | University students | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
LEIS, Adrian
× LEIS, Adrian× ERMANOV, Davron |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In this study, we investigate the benefits of using computer technology to assist language learning in a Japanese university English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom. Lessons were conducted introducing the conditional forms of English grammar (i.e., if clauses) to two groups: one taught using the traditional paper and the chalkboard and the other using computer presentation software without the use of any paper. Statistical analyses were conducted in order to discover whether there were any salient advantages to using paper-based materials in the lesson. Although statistically significant differences were observed between the pre-and posttests for both the group being taught in the traditional manner (t(22) = 2.25, p = .04, d = .62) and the group being taught using presentation software (t(15) = 3.15, p < .01, d = 1.07), no significant differences were observed between the two groups at the posttest stage, t(37) = .45, p = .65. The authors conclude that there seem to be no clear advantages to using paper-based materials in language instruction, and the use of computer presentation software allows more interaction between teachers and students, creating a more personalized learning atmosphere, which may lead to greater improvements in such environments over a longer period of time. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
宮城教育大学紀要 en : Bulletin of Miyagi University of Education 巻 50, p. 241-248, 発行日 2016-01-29 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 宮城教育大学 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13461621 | |||||
